Re: Bug or Feature?

[Hitesh Patel <hitesh@presys.com>]

On Monday 29 April 2002 04:29 pm, Adam \"Tauvix\" Debus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>     Here's an example of a situation I find myself in currently:
>
>     I have a /19 (we'll call it 10.0.224.0/19). Under that I have allocated
> a /23 (10.0.226.0/23). We will also assume that 10.0.224.0/24 and
> 10.0.225.0/24 are already allocated. Note, allocated, not assigned. Now, I
> need to allocate a /24, so I click on the "Add Subnet" link for the /19,
> and the first /24 it comes up to be available for allocation is
> 10.0.226.0/24. Now, I want to use that entire /23 as a dialup pool. Should
> I be instead listing that as assigned?
>

Yeah, currently the code finds the first available block whether it's already 
under another block or not.  If you set the /23 to Assigned it will be 
ignored and you should get back 10.0.226.2/24

> Thanks,
>
> Adam "Tauvix" Debus
> Network Administrator, ReachONE Internet
> adam@reachone.com

-- 
+---------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Hitesh Patel                    |  Lead Developer            |
| hitesh@presys.com               |  NorthStar                 |
+---------------------------------+----------------------------+
| NorthStar: http://www.brownkid.net/NorthStar/                |
| PGP Key:   http://www.brownkid.net/pgpkey.asc                |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+